Showing posts with label federal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federal. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

"HEALTH CARE" MEANS A "STRAP ON" FOR YOU!

27 STATES WILL BE REQUIRED TO ENFORCE “HELMET LAWS” WITH NEW HEALTH CARE BILL MANDATES.


Big Rig truck driver’s have long since been considered by many as being the “Last Great American Cowboys”. Just get in their way in Pittsburgh this time of year and if they don’t push you off the Interstate, they’ll at least scare you out of their way. Try driving in the center lane of I-95 or I-75 down south and if you aren’t going AT LEAST 75 to 80 mph, you will get run over!


But in all fairness to the rest of us, the real “open road” still belongs to those who want the wind in their hair, the bugs in their teeth and the freedom to ride their two wheeled horse without a “skid lid”. No, demographically these aren’t the gang members or “James Dean” bad boys of forty years ago, but they are the (both men and women) motorcycle riders of today.


The feeling of FREEDOM in their riding is alive (but not well) in 27 states today because despite repeated extortion attempts (withholding highway funds and more) and extreme pressure by bureaucrats in Washington, these states still allow adults to ride without helmets.


But take your photos of smiling bikers today because very, very shortly, the states’ right to allow such freedom will be squashed like a bug.


The outrageously Unconstitutional “Health Care Bill” (or whatever name it masquerades by today), is packed with so much back door power and regulation, it will be childs play for Federal Government Agencies and Regulators to simply send out a memo to law enforcement nationwide that make the wearing of a helmet MANDATORY. After all, it will cost the Federal Health Care Insurance Agency (Opps! Did I let the cat out of the bag?), if someone gets hurt.


Over the next six months at every single opportunity, ask, e-mail or phone your state legislators and inquire what have they done to stop yet another power grab by the Obama Administration from states across America.


Every state has a “Motorcyclist Rights” organization of one form or another. Contact them today and make sure their members are aware of this coming violation of their rights. On the national level it’s time to begin a letter-writing campaign to the AMA.


For those of you who don’t ride, understand you are next.


Remember all the cartoon jokes early last year when Obama began firing people and took over the auto industry. Remember all the pictures of the “Pelosi-mobile” that she'd love to order you buy and drive?


Understand, all the time this Organized Criminal government intervention is taking place, I'll ask you to watch out for one thing. The next time you are on a highway that has a HOV lane, you may notice that local or state laws allow "Hybrid" or electric vehicles to use that lane with only one person aboard. Oddly enough, 9 out of 10 of those drivers are speeding. (That's "conservation"?) It's like one of our stickers says: "A Prius isn't an ECO car, it's an EGO car!"

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

AUDITING YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


On December 23, 1913, the Federal Reserve System, which serves as the nation's Central Bank, was created by an act of Congress. The System consists of a seven member Board of Governors with headquarters in Washington, D.C., and twelve Reserve Banks located in major cities throughout the United States.


The primary responsibility of the Central Bank is to influence the flow of money and credit in the nation's economy. Second, the boards of directors of the Federal Reserve Banks initiate changes in the discount rate, the rate of interest on loans made by Reserve Banks to depository institutions at the "discount window."


So here’s your first test question:


(True or False) The Federal Reserve System or Central Bank is a government organization.



FALSE -- The “Fed” isn’t really any more a government body than is the Federal Express shipping company.


While the people who run it at its highest levels are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, the seven members of the Board of Governors are theoretically treated to a “hands off” approach by any administration and the sitting Congress. So it flirts with being a wing of the government but whoever heard of a Congress man or woman ever telling the Fed what to do...and you know Congress loves to meddle with everything. So beyond the appointments things are definitely “private”.

The 12 Reserve Banks that are the true life blood outside of Washington have no political ties at all.


With that said, just why does the Fed’s URL on the Internet end with a .gov address? ( http://www.federalreserve.gov ) Seems like a marketing ploy to make Americans ”feel” like all the actions of “The Fed” are under control.



Now more serious details. --


By going to the Fed’s web site anyone can read weekly briefings on America’s monetary system. That’s a self-generated report card on how much your dollar is worth by explaining what backs it up.


Before I explain some recent and current valuations it’s important to look back to the “good old days”. No, I’m not jumping into the “Way-Back Machine” and talking about the precious time when our money was actually backed by gold. Let’s just go back to the period prior to 2005.


Originally the Fed had to rely on U.S. Treasury securities, Special Drawing Rights from the Treasury and Gold. A dollar was expected to be worth a dollar of something stable and valuable. They were required to work with the equivalent of AAA bonds.


That approach is what gave the world confidence is our little pieces of paper. You know, the ones that actually say “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE”. Our money doesn’t say “UNITES STATES NOTE” or “AMERICAN NOTE” because our country’s three branches of government all together don’t really back any of it. Ouch!


Is that “private organization” label starting to get to you yet?


It is one of the largest reasons why -- in light of the mega spend-a-thon by the current Administration and the country’s massive debt -- people have been buying gold like never before. Today it’s about $1,140 an ounce, a figure unimaginable by most just a year ago.


Back to ‘05. In it’s infinite wisdom (or perhaps just a way for Barney Frank to accelerate his “a house for everyone” agenda), rules on the value of Reserve Assets were changed for The Fed. There was a small blip on the political screen, but some temperance on the part of Directors went a long way in catching the public’s attention. A little manipulation with the same type of assets would go a long way.


But then came 2007 and a Fed that was in the middle of the nation’s housing boom. Oh it can’t hurt to buy some of those mortgage notes, can it?


The move allowed the march of plentiful cash and low interest rates to continue. Since everyone on Wall Street was backing up the Brinks truck every day, no one was going to question The Fed purchasing some paper and listing them as “other assets” on its Balance Sheet.


If anyone actually read the Fed reports, they had adjusted the backing in the U.S. dollar from a very conservative 96 cents to about 91 cents. No big deal most believed.


But things were about to unravel. By March 4, 2009 the reserves behind the American dollar had dropped to about 40 cents on the dollar! Smoke and mirrors were the act of the day with lots of reassurances from both government and The Fed. But by then the country was six months into a massive financial collapse. With big financial firms walking the plank every day, there were no longer any atheists in the fox holes.


If you look at the Fed’s balance sheet today the group portrays the amount of backing to be around 81 cents. Not good, but a huge move back into the land of the living. Unfortunately little by little, people are beginning to see that assets just aren’t what they use to be.


The New York Federal Reserve Bank put on it’s cape and top hat and poof, it created a dummy LLC called Maiden Lane so the Fed could “sell” $775 Billion dollars in mortgages paper from Bear Stearns and AIG. Now instead of saying the paper was a Fed asset -- because EVERYBODY knows the paper is junk -- the Fed is claiming an Accounts Receivable from Maiden Lane as an asset, things are just soooo much better!


So that’s how they got the value behind the dollar back up above 80 cents.


The problem with this approach is simple. When (not if) inflation takes off (maybe even with ‘hyper inflation’), the Fed would normally turn to its “assets” and sell something to keep things in line. Too bad they have paper (from Maiden Lane, Bear Sterns and AIG) that no one will take off their hands.


One last ‘little’ concern comes from a dirty secret that should be easy enough for most people to understand.


The Federal Reserve Central Bank sells money to a select group of financial institutions around the country. They do this so those banks can offer loans to its customers and the availability of that money keeps rates low.


This “inner circle” buys money at a discount (below “par” or full value). Let’s say they step up to the bar and their buddies at the Fed say “How about if we sell you some dollars for 93 or 96 cents today?”


“OK” says the banks.


In the past this whole idea of getting a discount on the dollar was a good one because the money did get loaned out into the community. It might go immediately, the next few days or in the weeks and months to come. Of course this was a reasonable business transaction because -- in time -- the financial people charged interest on the loans.


But people are so impatient these days.


So impatient that now-a-days these same banks and institutions are allowed to head back to the “Cashier’s Window” at The Fed JUST SIX DAYS LATER and sell the money back. By the way. They sell it back at full par value ($1.00). So they hold a buck that the paid 96 cents for and without loaning a nickel to anyone, they get 100 cents back for it.


Four cents doesn’t seem like much until you multiply it out by 100 million or more because that’s the amount of money involved. No wonder the bonuses keep rolling on.


That’s a look at The Fed.


Look at the Central Bank’s web site for PDF documents that take you week by week through Wonderland.


My thanks to Roger Shealy who isn’t waiting for Congress to order an audit of The Fed. He has done extensive research on The Fed and has even succeeded in getting the organization to change some of its reports so they are more complete.


Check this link: http://skadvisors.com/index_files/20090316_collateral%20damaged.pdf

Sunday, May 31, 2009

SONIA SOTOMAYOR RULES 2nd AMENDMENT GUN RIGHTS INVALID AT THE STATE LEVEL

Even Democrats are shocked at this opinion from Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor and it's sure to make her confirmation hearings heat up.  The question now is will President Obama's latest "let's rush this through" command hold enough weight that the growing backlash can overcome a biased, blessing press and a Marxist political takeover of the nation.  

People who have found out how deeply Sotomayor's beliefs counter traditional American philosophies are now openly against her nomination.

SOTOMAYOR RULED IN JANUARY 2009 THAT STATES DO NOT HAVE TO OBEY THE SECOND AMENDMENT'S COMMANDMENT THAT THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

In 
Maloney v. Cuomo, Sotomayor signed an opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that said the Second Amendment does not protect individuals from having their right to keep and bear arms restricted by state governments.

The opinion said that the Second Amendment only restricted the federal government from infringing on an individual's right to keep and bear arms. As justification for this position, the opinion cited the 1886 Supreme Court case of 
Presser v. Illinois.

Sotomayor's decision rejected the Fourteenth Amendment's incorporation doctrine as far as the Second Amendment was concerned and her ruling ran to the left of even the reliably liberal San Francisco-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


They reviewed a similar rights question and ruled in the April 2009 case Nordyke v. King that the Second Amendment did, in fact, apply to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment, heavily citing the Supreme Court in Heller.


Whenever you have a conflict like this, you’re likely to have it end up before the Supreme Court so they can decide the issue.  One question Sotomayor must be asked in Congressional hearings is whether she would recuse herself from any review of either of the cases involved -- if she was a member of the Supreme Court.


Already being questioned over blatant Feminist, Racist and joking remarks about "activist" Court practices and the Law, Sotomayor is now being defined as a "chip off the old (Obama) block" and a radical supporter of his agenda.  Her remark about "knowing better" rings arrogantly more true every day.

Read the full article here:  http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=48718

Select from over 100 slogans so you can "Speak your mind all the time" at http://www.SatireWorks.com. Bumper stickers, T-shirts, buttons, hats and more.