Wednesday, August 26, 2009


While the "smoke and mirrors" campaign goes on with President Obama trying to redirect your attention away from the giant air bag going down in flames just a few hundred miles south of Lakehurst, there are a lot of other very interesting disasters waiting in the wings for the Administration.

When the Health Care Debate goes away -- either with a bogus, gutted Bill to save face for Big O -- or, heaven forbid, a real takeover of Health Care in the United States, things will still be a "Friday the 13th" sequel. Cap and Trade (a completely disingenuous attempt to steal and redistribute huge sums of money from both American business and Americans themselves, to cronies of the Green Movement), Prisoner Relocation (a death sentence for Obama when he finally has to stop lying just to fulfill a Leftist campaign promise), Card Check (the ultimate gift to the unions) and Illegal Immigration (that pesky little thing about 20 million people who all by themselves would bankrupt America with their welfare and healthcare demands).

And you thought the B(arack) S(peak) would go away soon? Silly American...

I bring this up because of all the miseries mentioned above, I failed to mention the biggest one President Obama WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH!

Does the name HILLARY CLINTON mean anything to you. Does the term "Puppet Master" strike a familiar chord?

Unrest and unrequited attention "owed" to others is about to fester into the most deadly cancer President Obama could possibly suffer from.

Obama is such an incredible hog with the spot light, Bill and Hillary Clinton are left to wander in the back woods of New York somewhere. That simply doesn't work for either one of them.

Bill has dealt with an enormous inferiority complex for years. Many a therapist would quickly identify this as the main reason why his penis has probably gotten more exposure over the years than Obama on TV. Where did this come from? Say hello to the "Puppet Master" just down the hall.

Referring back to the therapists, let me introduce you to a term many have never heard of: "SHAME-BASED CONTROL".

I am one who believes wholeheartedly that Hillary Clinton controlled Bill Clinton's life from their days in college, their tramping through Communist Europe, time spent in and out of office in Arkansas (when she wasn't TOO busy at that Law Firm pulling some fast ones -- or celebrating every time an "associate" suffered an early demise in their 20's, 30's or 40's). She was one busy lady! Come on now. Don't be too harsh on Hillary. Much like a certain football player (formerly) from Atlanta, she just lived in a societal environment where certain things happen as a normal course of events. Tisk, tisk. Dogs, humans; not much difference to animal rights believers.

I can only guess that Bill's sexual track record had it's international beginnings prior to Arkansas and with Hillary in tow. But that was the perfect opening for (as Feminists would mislabel her) a "strong" woman. Bill wouldn't have had a clue what was building as Hillary waited for his first run for Governor and to begin telling him just what to do.

She was furious when he ignored her advice and lost his reelection campaign and -- sensing her control over the man was not complete enough -- the strings were snugged up a bit. She took Bill "out to the woodshed" that night and told him he screwed up and she was going to be in charge from that day forward. Bill's objections were tempered with the shame of losing and the added burden of Hillary telling him something like "I know of all the whores you've been bedding and unless you want me to tell everyone and play the victim in the press, you'll do as you are told." Perhaps she tossed him a warm fuzzy at the same time reassuring Bill that if he did listen to her, she would eventually get him elected President. Not a bad job if you can get it.

So that's "shame-based control" in a nutshell. 'You've been a bad boy and I'm going to tell.' Years later that was still working. Maybe Monica didn't need to get a "hall pass" from Hillary every time she dropped by the Oval Office to give Bill a "tune up", but don't kid yourself. Hillary's staff kept track and filed daily reports to their Exalted Leader. Feminism today is all about power and control. Too bad. I miss the old days of the ERA and the concept that men and women might be treated equally.

While Bill and Hillary hit the financial jackpot by winning the Presidency (Yes, Mrs. President, I remembered to include you!), and that windfall has accelerated in the past five years, going from being both penniless and homeless to having multiple millions in the bank and a free mansion in New York, that will never fill the emotional needs of Bill or the power-hungry ones of Hillary.

Bill gets let out of the kennel on occasion like his recent role-playing trip to "rescue" two hardcore Feminist reporters who had indeed (by their own admission), illegally crossed into Korean territory. It would seem Al Gore -- their boss at Current (ly bogus) TV -- would have gotten the assignment but maybe he was just too busy sitting at home in his mansion (you know, the one with the billion square foot carbon footprint).

But it has made national news that Hillary is not a happy camper these days with her role as Secretary of State. It's not exactly going as planned and Obama isn't relying on her for much of anything, let alone her advice. Her projected vision of being another Henry Kissinger (or winning 'So Think You Can Dance') just isn't panning out.

Unfortunately for Hillary and her own ego, virtually all of the political momentum of the hardcore, radical Feminists appears to be at risk too. That isn't sitting well with a lot of skirts (and even pant suites) these days!

Is it a stretch to think an old emotional response that the Clintons had in the leaner days of the Presidential campaign won't raise it's ugly head again? One of the off-the-cuff ('don't quote me') quotes that circulated from the Clinton staff was "Nice kid, but he'll never win" when Obama started overtaking her in the poles.

Now-a-days thoughts from the Clinton's inner circle are likely more like "This little Black Bastard thinks he's got it all. Doesn't he know who WE are?"

The gals over at NOW have to be getting a little anxious as well. Sure Obama threw them a bone when the VERY FIRST LAW HE SIGNED (in public) was a Feminist-backed effort to extend the rights of a woman to sue an employer over pay discrimination. I still remember the large group of "influential people" standing behind Obama when he signed the bill. Most of them were dressed in conservative, dark clothing. Hillary -- our new Secretary of State -- was there dressed in a bright pink outfit. It shouted "Look at me!" and clearly signaled to her Feminist supporters she was "collecting" on at least one promise Obama may have made to gain her support.

But all this is old news. "What have you done for me lately?" comes up with the answer "Nothing".

If Hillary Clinton sized up President Obama's current fall from grace in the political polls as an opening, her first response (on behalf of Bill and herself) might be the demand for a bigger piece of the spotlight. But if Hillary is back to her old ways of enjoying authoritarian control and also serving the Feminists, Barack Obama has a lot more to worry about.

Hillary is an expert liar. She proved that repeatedly in the past and she may not hesitate to pull out that deck of cards once again. Things will be incedious at first, using as many stealth methods as possible.

I would keep a very close eye on newly elected Senator from New Hampshire, Jeanne Shaheen and, more importantly, her husband Bill. Bill Shaheen has a very colorful past for being one of the biggest dirty tricksters in the Democratic Party. Remember, he worked for Hillary in the early days of her '08 Presidential Campaign and was "released" for a foot-in-mouth brain cramp that was a little too hard for Hillary to ignore.

Many in political circles believe Bill Shaheen didn't just go back to New Hampshire and do some fishing. He has a bevy of PC daughters who follow in lockstep with mom's Feminist beliefs. I suspect any of them would jump back on the bandwagon with Hillary if called upon.

What might be an effective approach for Hillary to destroy Obama? Blow right on by the "shame-based control" of the past because Michelle would whip her ass in a beat down. But if Hillary set him up for failure on the international stage -- making him look guilty even if he actually had nothing to do with the crisis -- I'm sure she would be the first to cover her backside.

I'll call upon the therapists one more time. Although I don't know the clinical term for this one, it's still easy enough to explain.

In life each of us are faced with problems. Hopefully with little or no prodding individuals get around to figuring out their answer to things. It may result is a good or a bad outcome, but at least people try.

The "Teflon" approach is to procrastinate, let small problems fester and then -- at the point most people realize they must finally make a decision -- they crawl under the carpet and let the bombs go off. Shrapnel hits everyone else and then like the Phoenix the person rises from the ashes unscathed.

I've seen this in action. Often the perpetrator plays the role of 'victim' despite the fact that they orchestrated everything. If Hillary were to pull this one on Obama she wouldn't have to play the victim (although she could by claiming he tied her hands so she couldn't prevent the mess). More than likely she would muster her troops and charge forward to "save the day" for the Democratic Party (and the Feminists), offering to replace Obama's leadership in 2012 (or sooner!).

Another possibility would be for Bill Shaheen to dig up real proof that allegations in "Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?" are very true. Is America ready for it's first bi-sexual, drug addict President? I don't think so.

Does Shaheen or Clinton herself have enough political clout to get all of those Obama associates who wouldn't grant interviews during the '08 Campaign, to finally answer a few questions? We'll see.

We live in a country where reality resides in a cesspool just inches below the surface. While most Americans are too terrified to ever look below the facade, what lies ahead might bubble to the surface all by itself. Just don't step in it because the whole thing stinks!

Like I said in the beginning, getting by the Health Care debate may only open the barn door to a raging herd inside. Shakespeare is pounding to get out of his grave so he can write just one more grand tragedy.

Your turn...


Rumblings have begun about just what "must" be done in the 2010 Election Cycle. Blogs are beginning to fill with "win-loss" scenarios with head counts from both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate.

Reasonable arguments are being made that voters can create a total shift from the current Democratic control to one of Republican control. Others argue that to do so would just set the table for President Barack Obama to go on having someone else to blame for all his failures. In response to that prospect still others urge voters in America to replace a "certain number" so neither party have dominant control.

I am greatly concerned when people think they can fine tune an election process so there will be "just enough" of anything. One hopes the reality that "control is an illusion" quickly comes to mind.

The battle at hand is to wrestle our country back from a radical group of Far, Far Left Radical Progressives who continue to straddle the Ivory Towers of elitist educational environments and the swamps of political corruption at their deepest.

First and foremost the deranged and/or totally corrupt members of Congress must be thrown out. I don't know what it will take, but perhaps every ounce of energy, every dollar available and every bit of pressure imaginable must be focused on removing a relatively small group.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Henry Waxman, Charlie Rangel, Christopher Dodd, Barbra Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Jeanne Shaheen and Olympia Snowe would be on my list. Oh, let’s not forget Pennsylvania’s “finest”, John Murtha. He may not be in the same political bedroom as the others but he does his very best to feed at the money trough in Washington. “Cutting government spending” would NEVER be his agenda.

Nancy would be first on my list. I’m just frustrated that I don’t have the millions of dollars it would take to move enough people into her Congressional District, get them registered and then vote her out of office. Understand this example. The “Queen of the Nanny State” is revered by legislators in Sacramento who passed more waco laws in 2008 like the one that requires “anyone under the age of 13 to wear a life preserver in order to go swimming in California”. Their reasoning? There were so many illegal aliens from Mexico who couldn’t speak English and they didn’t know how to yell “Help” if they were drowning. (Yes, that was the comment from the Legislative Leaders!)

Clearly some of you might have to avoid the natural response...”Their Illegals. Let them drown.” The other reaction could more passionately be for the 99% in that same age group who simply want to enjoy a comforting and fun swim.

In the last 100 years (or more?), there has not been a greater threat to everything that has made America the great nation that it is. People associated with the Obama Administration -- whether in political office, acting as a Czar or those behind the scenes sending you SPAM or pulling other dirty tricks -- are all dangerous and seemingly have no interest in protecting, serving or promoting America. Many are criminals, tax cheats, declared Communists or good old fashion, power-hungry sociopaths. Meanwhile we have a President who spends every waking moment in what psychologists call "Pretend Reality".

It's laughable that years ago people use to scoff at Ronald Regan's run for the Presidency to be one of "just an actor".

In truth, President Barack Obama makes it nearly a daily occurrence to stand in the spot light while he lies his butt off to America. Now that's acting! Thankfully Americans are growing tired of the Obama Soap Opera.

One of the bumper stickers from says: "To Obama it's not a job, it's an adventure and we're paying for the ride!" I don't think the man has anything but his own ego to be served each day. If you were upset with recent political cartoons of him portrayed as "The Joker", how are you going to feel when he is accurately portrayed with a tight little black mustache on his upper lip?

Here's your chance to speak out. You can either e-mail us (customer services at or comment on the blog. How would you defeat a Nancy Pelosi in the 2010 Election?

Tuesday, August 25, 2009


This TV ad simply tells the truth about Obamacare.

It was crafted by Dick Morris, the Fox News contributor and famous campaign strategist.

This powerful ad features a respected medical doctor - a neurosurgeon, in fact - who warns that Obamacare will decimate healthcare for seniors and others in need of life-saving medical procedures.

As Dr. Cuffe explains in the ad, if Obama gets his way and adds 50 million new patients to the government system, it inevitably will lead to rationing of healthcare procedures and vital medicines for the elderly.

Dr. Cuffe says universal healthcare has led to this same situation in Canada and England.

We know why ABC is so afraid of the League of American Voter's TV ad. It knows the message resonates with the American people.

This is the same network that aired an infomercial for the Obama plan directly from the White House.


545 versus 300,000,000

Every day we here at receive all kinds of e-mail (you're invited to send if you wish) and today was no exception. One that caught our eye did not have a signature line but it seemed to be such a great reminder of the power of the vote, we had to make up a new product line and reprint the note. Our thanks to whomever originally wrote this.


Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does..
You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.
You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking
thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party. What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits.

The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red ..
If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.
They, and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.
Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.
We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it Is up to you. We hope you will send this link to your family, friends and associates to make sure they have a chance to read it.

You are also invited to stop by and look over the 250 slogans we have in production.