Sarah Palin promotes Allen West’s challenge of Democratic U.S. Rep. Ron Klein

Former GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin is supporting Republican congressional candidate Allen West in Southern Florida. While not directly mentioning Lt. Colonel West’s opponent -- U.S. Rep. Ron Klein, D-Boca Raton -- by name, Palin characterizes the two-term incumbent “a leftwing ideologue as someone who’s marched to the beat of Nancy Pelosi on every issue from Cap-and-Tax to the stimulus, TARP, and, of course, Obamacare.

Here is a video clip of West when he appeared with Sean Hannity late last year. I’ve also provided a link for a very stimulating speech West gave in 2009.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M

THE SCOTT BROWN AD YOU NEED TO SEE

There was a lot of talk about how much money the Democratic Party poured into Massachusetts to try to save the recent election between Martha Coakley and Scott Brown.

Here is a spot that the Brown campaign ran on their own and you can clearly see why he won.

IT'S BEEN AN INTERESTING WEEK, HASN'T IT?

I knew going into the week that things were about to get interesting. No, I didn't claim any level of clairvoyance or have a shining crystal ball to guide me, like many others I was just looking at the hand writing on the wall.

When (on Jan. 5th) the store side of Satire Works started selling stickers, pins and more promoting the campaign run of Scott Green in Massachusetts, it was obvious momentum was really beginning to pick up. On a daily basis sales would double and then double again. In fact even this morning we continue to fill orders related to the newly elected Senator Brown.

What's important to point out is that those sales were going to both men and women in basically equal numbers. But what may be even more surprising to many is that we sold these items to people in 19 states -- Massachusetts, California, New York, West Virginia, North and South Carolina, Maryland, Georgia, Illinois, Virginia, Delaware, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon, New Jersey, Washington DC and Idaho. I think that speaks volumes about the national attention and support this election generated.

Interesting.

So where do things go from here? Senator-elect Brown is making the rounds in Washington today and whether it's intentional or not, his future role can be easily summed up by his public actions. One of his first meetings was with his "friend", Senator John McCain. Yes, THAT John McCain who angers Conservatives across America and represents some of the most Liberal (Progressive???) values and opinions of any currently serving U.S. Congressman.

I'm not saying Brown is actually getting the "Welcome" mat thrown out by the Democrats, but with his open comments this morning about his previous votes in support of the Massachusetts (failing) health care bills, this would be an excellent time to remind everyone of this. Scott Brown comes from a state that is well left of center (after all, that's why there was such an uproar over a Republican getting elected in Massachusetts). In truth he was elected by the "Independents" who represent nearly half of all registered voters. Bottom line? Think through the realities and you'll realize Brown is no Sarah Palin even if he does drive around in a Chevrolet pick up truck.

Is that a terrible thing? I don't think so. His election was a great example of Americans (no matter what state they live in), storming the wheelhouse on the Ship of State. The voters wrestled control away and steered the American Titanic from the iceberg that was dead ahead.

This is a great success story and it should be celebrated. At the same time take a good look over your shoulder and remember the impressions and expectations that were created leading up to the 2008 National Election. Brown is no Obama, but he's still a politician and quite honestly, based on his voting record in Mass, I expect him to be a left-leaning Centrist most of the time.

As a final word on that I'd like to bring out these thoughts. I am extremely pleased and relieved that Martha Coakley was not elected to the Senatorial seat.

While reporters from Fox News (if nowhere else) have pointed out the typical Elitist expectations of a Liberal/Progressive Democrat that the seat was "her's for the taking", there is a bigger issue that has only been briefly touched upon by one national figure. On Tuesday's program Rush Limbaugh pulled out the "Feminist" card in discussing Coakley. Listening to Rush's comments made me almost fall out of my chair. It was as if I was listening to recordings of my comments made since the mid 80's.

For the past twenty five years, hardcore Feminists in the Northeast have exercised a level of cruelty unrecognized by any national media members. No, that isn't too strong a word. It is absolute reality.

Personally I have tried repeatedly to educate Americans across the country about the brutality toward men that is alive and well in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Maine. Aside from Manhattan in New York, these areas have been the homes of Feminist Terrorists for many, many years. Think of Hillary Clinton's alma mater, Wellesley College. Then there is Smith in Northampton, the undisputed capital of Feminist sexuality since the late Sixties. These are the people who take great pride in their first "highjacking", stealing women's legitimate efforts in the 60's and 70's to create 'equality'. The "NOW-ified ERA" -- a pure Dominance and Control effort -- is their Holy Grail.

How has this played out?

In both Massachusetts and New Hampshire (even Pennsylvania) there are court records of fathers (you know, those people who lose custody 80% of the time) being billed as much as 160% of their GROSS income for the "support" of ONE CHILD. Of course the majority of Americans still don't realize that there isn't a state in the country that REQUIRES PROOF that even one cent of "child support" has been spent on the child. Over the years Feminists consistently fought to have parents who couldn't keep up with such support orders, labeled "Deadbeat Dads", despite the fact that there are females across the country who have walked away from similar requirements.

In another child-related issue in which Martha Coakley and Feminism crossed paths was the "Fells Acre Day Care" case. Radical Feminists within the therapeutic community (Social Workers are also literally trained to terrorize, condemn and marginalize men in college classrooms in New England), subjected children to brainwashing and severe manipulation so the children would create horrific stories about staff actions in the day care facility. Children ended up making up stories that would make any UFO enthusiast into a follower for life. The problem was Coakley allowed an astounding amount of testimony to be proffered and all those charged were convicted.

Of course as appeals were processed, the truth came our years later and the misconduct of the prosecution team, "professional therapists" and other members of the railroading effort were exposed. Was anyone ever prosecuted for misconduct or lying about what they did? No.

The Fells Acre case was not unique. A similar extreme level of misconduct happened in Worcester County, Massachusetts when a social worker put six children in a meeting together to see who could come up with the 'best abuse story' about a male school teacher from Sturbridge. The basis of the case was a local woman had filed for a divorce from a husband who had no money. She looked at a local family who had actually befriended her child in the past and 'pointed the finger'. Along with the accusation came a $300,000 law suit. When a local judge threw out all but one charge in a probable cause hearing, he was giving her a gracious way to walk away but, backed by Feminists out to claim another scalp, she continued.

She forced her young daughter to testify (and lie) in an open courtroom in which the girl was actually admonished for 'making up stories' by the judge. It took a jury a little over 40 minutes to return a verdict of "Not Guilty", even though a few members wanted to 'hang out' long enough to get a free lunch!

Were things much different in New Hampshire or Maine? No.

A female school teacher in Hampton, NH made a surrogate of her teenage daughter for years, actually admitted the coercion and her refusal to participate in family counseling or seek any method to stop orchestration of incestuous abuse in the home. The outcome? Of course her husband went to prison (even though he actually left the marriage, participated in years of counseling for being an 'abused spouse' and a rape victim at his wife's hands). The Feminists portrayed the wife as "the victim" and she was awarded 99% of family and his business assets in a 'No Fault' divorce.

In another case from New Hampshire, a woman hires two other people to help her commit a 'home invasion' and kidnapping of her daughter. The plan was to kill her In-Laws and former husband and snatch the child and take her out of state. The criminal team showed up dressed in Ninja outfits, with concrete blocks to sink the bodies of the three adults in a lake at Governor's Island. The plan failed and the two people she hired went to prison. But her attorneys dressed her in a outfit straight out of Amish country of Pennsylvania, complete with new 'horn rim' glasses. Again she was portrayed as a 'victim' and ACQUITTED OF ALL CHARGES.

Maine holds the ultimate trump card for a 'Feminist Victory'. A woman in southern Maine got 'upset' because her live-in boyfriend had sex with another woman. She killed him.

How was it handled in the courts? She was declared to be a 'Battered Woman' (even though there was no proof of the man ever laying a hand on the woman), and that status was a viable excuse to find her not guilty of any crime.

These true stories are just a few examples of Feminist cruelty. Keep that in mind when you listen to the irrational babbling and questionable actions of some of the females running for public office. Clearly not all women are like this and it's very, very important to point out hundreds of thousands of women back Sarah Palin because she is nothing like this. Nancy Pelosi and almost every other woman currently serving in Washington, are a whole other matter.

Thank you Rush for speaking out. It only took New Hampshire 30 YEARS, but perhaps we can finally start a national discussion on 'The Status of Men'.

Like I said, it's been an interesting week.

"YOU LIE! - EVERY DEMOCRAT - EVERY WORD - EVERY DAY.

This new slogan says it all.

"YOU LIE! EVERY DEMOCRAT - EVERY WORD - EVERY DAY. You're DONE and we are taking OUR

country back in 2010." Available today at http://SatireWorks.com .

DESTROYING THE "MACHINE" TUESDAY IN MASSACHUSETTS

Tuesday is a watershed moment for citizens of Massachusetts. As of Monday morning, Scott Brown leads Coakley in the polls.

With a vote for Scott Brown in the Senatorial race people can finally say "NO MORE" to the radical Progressives who are riding a bullet train to our country's collapse. Electing Brown will dramatically change the landscape not only in the state but in the entire country. The hand writing will be on the wall that the Democrats, the Progressives, the Liberals, the Union Activists and the Feminists, who have long butchered people with their cruel lies, have gone too far and it's time to go.

We encourage people from all over New England to show up at the polls in Massachusetts and picket with signs of support for Brown. Crowds that surround the polls with signs to save America will get on the news and in the media world wide. Do your part to shut the "insanity machine" down.

Want ANOTHER reason to NOT vote for Martha Coakley???

Posted By Curt Schilling On January 14, 2010 @ 11:02 am

If she hasn’t done it yet, Martha Coakley may have just killed her campaign.

She’s apparently been trying to win the title of Worst Political Campaign Ever, and she might have just clinched it with her little dig at Scott Brown over Fenway Park.

The appearance characterizes Coakley’s approach to this truncated race. Aware that she has little time for the hand-shaking and baby-kissing of a standard political campaign, she has focused instead on rallying key political leaders, Democratic activists, and union organizers, in hope they will get people to the polls.

… Despite that, there is a subdued, almost dispassionate quality to her public appearances, which are surprisingly few. Her voice is not hoarse from late-night rallies. Even yesterday, the day after a hard-hitting debate, she had no public campaign appearances in the state.

Coakley bristles at the suggestion that, with so little time left, in an election with such high stakes, she is being too passive.

“As opposed to standing outside Fenway Park? In the cold? Shaking hands?’’ she fires back, in an apparent reference to a Brown online video of him doing just that. “This is a special election. And I know that I have the support of Kim Driscoll. And I now know the members of the [Salem] School Committee, who know far more people than I could ever meet.’’

There are just so many things wrong with that statement.

It shows her elitism and arrogance unbelievably. Aside from the apparent feeling that the seat belongs to her just by virtue of her party, she just admitted that she doesn’t need to bother meeting with constituents because she’s meeting people like Kim Driscoll, and political leaders, and Democrat activists. I guess they’re the ones that matter, huh? I know it’s a “special election” and all, but that doesn’t mean that she doesn’t need to fight for this seat. Prancing around with this mindset of “Oh, I’m a Democrat, therefore Ted Kennedy’s seat just automatically belongs to me regardless of what the people think,” is idiotic. Acting as if she doesn’t need to give her constituents the time of day is ludicrous. She can make all the snide remarks about Scott Brown shaking hands with people in the cold that she wants, but that’s what you’re supposed to do when you’re trying to get elected. She seems to have forgotten that she’s trying to get elected in Massachusetts, and not in Washington D.C. — if she remembered that, maybe she’d spend more time trying to impress Massachusetts voters and less time rubbing elbows with the Democrat establishment, Big Pharmacy lobbyists, and union leaders. Most normal politicians, Republican or Democrat, do go shake hands with voters. Even if it means standing in the cold outside of Fenway Park.

Finally, has she forgotten who she’s talking to? What state she’s wanting to represent in the Senate? It’s Massachusetts. You do not make sneering insults about Fenway Park. What’s she going to do next, insult the Red Sox? That’d really just be the cherry on top of a delightful campaign। Fenway Park and the Red Sox are damned near sacred to Massachusetts residents, Bostonians in particular. Really, I’m starting to think that she just doesn’t want to get elected or something. Because anyone with half a modicum of sense knows that you do not go into Boston and mess with Fenway Park.

--------------

Scott Brown’s group will conduct the “BOLD NEW LEADERSHIP” Bus Tour Saturday, the 16th. With the special election just a few days away they are trying to show the people of Massachusetts that a victory can take place.

Thomas Crane Public Library Sat. 9 am
40 Washington Street
Quincy, MA

9/12 GROUP MEETS ONE WEEK BEFORE CHRISTMAS!

The last two weeks have gone by in a blur. Between the usual holiday happenings and some business challenges, the effort to do some blogging has been a bit on hold. My apologies.

As far as Washington goes, the last two weeks have been nothing more than "Ground Hog Day, the Sequel". Day after day there is the usual waste of time as Dems dance around the truth and hold to the belief "If we just tell the lies long enough, they'll be accepted as fact." It doesn't seem much of a stretch either to believe their mind set is that Americans are too busy to notice just how despicable Senatorial (and Presidential) actions really are.

Friday came with a bit of a surprise when the Ultra Liberal "Move On" group came out against the Health Care Bill. They joined the "Screamer from Vermont" who had done the same this week. Of course it was only because they felt the current measure has been gutted and doesn't fulfill the dreams of the lunatic fringe in the Progressive camp. Someone sing them a line from "Get Over It".

Another surprise came from the pre-election polls in Florida that revealed the Republican Senatorial race that Charlie Crist was suppose to win in a cake walk are now dead even with challenger Marco Rubio. Marco started out in single digits so to tie at 43% with Charlie is a real success story. I think I'll give that one to his conservative message that he hammers home every day.

The final surprise in my day came at 7 pm when I attended a 9/12 group meeting in Volusia County, Florida. Who in their right mind would imagine -- with a week to go before Christmas and on a Friday night -- that such a group could put over a hundred people in a little community hall in Holly Hill. A GREAT BIG 'CONGRATS' GO TO ALL THE AMERICANS IN THE ROOM!!!

Sorry Politicals. As the latest polls indicate, the leading 'Party' isn't the Republicans or the Democrats. It's the 'Tea Party' in America. Meetings like this one prove the unrest and discontent is not going away.

On a closing note, I'd like to ask a favor in advance.

If someone wins the $92 million in the Powerball Lottery Saturday, I'd like you to donate $1 million so I can arrange for thousands of people to travel to Nancy Pelosi's home district for two days. I'm thinking November first and second, 2010 would be a great time to visit and use the Democrats "day of voting registration" standard so they can support their 'candidate of choice' :- )

PELOSI IS IN LEGAL HOT WATER OVER OWENS' VOTE IN CONGRESS

Many of you have heard that the election for U.S. House of Representatives in District 23 of upstate New York is now in question.

While it appeared Independent candidate Doug Hoffman lost the rather unusual election (remember the endorsed Republican candidate was exposed as a hard core Liberal and she withdrew), by about 6000 votes, as of today he has cut that loss by one half.

The nervous tension that has arisen on both sides of the political aisle is that the results may very well be headed for a recount because so many of the outstanding absentee ballots aren’t due until Monday and they are expected to come largely from military people. It may not be enough to change the outcome of the election but hope has indeed been restored.

What hasn’t been reported by many is a very important effect the initial results set into motion.

Democratic candidate Bill Owens immediately boogied off to Washington and voted Saturday night on Nancy Pelosi’s pet monster project, the Health Care Bill. And here is where life beats a Hollywood script every time.

The New York Election officials refused to ‘certify’ the results of the election as soon as they notice the dramatic swing with the absentee votes. (Obviously Hillary wasn’t at home last week or this might never have happened!)

Not only did New York State Board of Elections officials hold back on their authorization, they contacted Nancy Pelosi directly and told her the Democratic candidate (who, at this point IS NOT THE ‘WINNER’) could not be legally seated in Congress.

NANCY PELOSI IGNORED THEIR CAUTIONARY INFORMATION AND SEATED HIM ANYWAY SO HE COULD HELP IN THE VERY NARROW PELOSI WIN IN PASSING THE HOUSE VERSION OF THE BILL.

Knowingly allowing an ‘unelected’, common citizen from New York to sit in Congress and actually vote on a Bill stretches any semblance of legality or common sense and IT ACTUALLY MAKES THE ENTIRE HOUSE VOTE UNOFFICIAL AND VOID!

There are justifiable expectations that certification of the election will come by Tuesday or Wednesday and the overall results will not change, but that does not excuse Pelosi’s radical actions.

See should be subject to an ethics review that removes her from holding the position as Speaker of the House.

WATCH OUT FOR "REPUBLICANS V 2.0"

It's inevitable that over the next six months Americans are going to see some "changes" from the Republican Party. After all, haven't the events of the past few weeks in Virginia, New Jersey and New York been a pretty good head slap for the establishment?

Well despite what did or did not happen recently, let's not lose sight of another politician who made the word "change" (or was it really "chains"?), the most dishonest word in the English language. Why does the"lipstick on a pig" comment suddenly come to mind?

Let's get to the point. Don't be naive enough to expect much of anything to actually be different with the Grand Old Party. The operative word there is "Old" and yes, it does reflect the power brokers who will still be in complete control of things.

A few months ago Newt Gingrich reappeared on the national scene, making a number of TV and public appearances and once again proving he is a close second to Bird as an American historian. People began buying Gingrich/Palin 2012 bumper stickers from Satire Works (even females in Boston!), and things were looking interesting. And then he backed Dede Scozzafava in New York.

He didn't just back her, he practically scolded those of us from the lower class (non politicians) for even suggesting we shouldn't bow down or kneel before party "leaders" when they decreed that this hard core, Progressive Liberal was the chosen one for New Yorkers. When I saw Newt on Fox News endorsing her I had to leave the room to puke.

That's what Conservatives are up against. Halloween may be over but don't expect the power brokers at the GOP to take the costumes off any time soon. And don't be fooled if you happen to notice them simply change disguises from time to time. Even when they have been locked out of the room in DC and have the least amount of power and influence in years, there are many political addicts who haven't even come close to "hitting bottom" and realizing they need to change. Today might be too soon for an "intervention" because their level of denial is still so strong, but as 2009 wraps up and we head into 2010 let's leave them as many holiday greetings as possible. In other words, tell them again and again and again, "inclusion" does not mean accepting Progressives or others who are left of center. We can be inclusive by keeping an open door to those who are driven from the Liberal Left because of its extremism, but don't plan on giving them the keys to the kingdom the next day!

The 2010 Election should be an absolute landslide victory for Republicans because the Obama Administration, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are very, very bad people. But if the Republican Party leaders BS us they won't deserve to celebrate even one new member in Congress. Talk about a "Lose - Lose" situation.

How do we avoid this insane outcome where the Republican slate of candidates is rejected and the Obama Radicals get to stay in power? We do it by searching out true conservatives today, tomorrow and every day from now until Election ("Ejection") Day, first to find great candidates and then to get them elected.

You've been warned. Now get to work.

THE ILLUSIONS OF "WINNING TATICS" IN THE 2010 ELECTIONS

Rumblings have begun about just what "must" be done in the 2010 Election Cycle. Blogs are beginning to fill with "win-loss" scenarios with head counts from both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate.

Reasonable arguments are being made that voters can create a total shift from the current Democratic control to one of Republican control. Others argue that to do so would just set the table for President Barack Obama to go on having someone else to blame for all his failures. In response to that prospect still others urge voters in America to replace a "certain number" so neither party have dominant control.

I am greatly concerned when people think they can fine tune an election process so there will be "just enough" of anything. One hopes the reality that "control is an illusion" quickly comes to mind.

The battle at hand is to wrestle our country back from a radical group of Far, Far Left Radical Progressives who continue to straddle the Ivory Towers of elitist educational environments and the swamps of political corruption at their deepest.

First and foremost the deranged and/or totally corrupt members of Congress must be thrown out. I don't know what it will take, but perhaps every ounce of energy, every dollar available and every bit of pressure imaginable must be focused on removing a relatively small group.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Henry Waxman, Charlie Rangel, Christopher Dodd, Barbra Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Jeanne Shaheen and Olympia Snowe would be on my list. Oh, let’s not forget Pennsylvania’s “finest”, John Murtha. He may not be in the same political bedroom as the others but he does his very best to feed at the money trough in Washington. “Cutting government spending” would NEVER be his agenda.

Nancy would be first on my list. I’m just frustrated that I don’t have the millions of dollars it would take to move enough people into her Congressional District, get them registered and then vote her out of office. Understand this example. The “Queen of the Nanny State” is revered by legislators in Sacramento who passed more waco laws in 2008 like the one that requires “anyone under the age of 13 to wear a life preserver in order to go swimming in California”. Their reasoning? There were so many illegal aliens from Mexico who couldn’t speak English and they didn’t know how to yell “Help” if they were drowning. (Yes, that was the comment from the Legislative Leaders!)

Clearly some of you might have to avoid the natural response...”Their Illegals. Let them drown.” The other reaction could more passionately be for the 99% in that same age group who simply want to enjoy a comforting and fun swim.

In the last 100 years (or more?), there has not been a greater threat to everything that has made America the great nation that it is. People associated with the Obama Administration -- whether in political office, acting as a Czar or those behind the scenes sending you SPAM or pulling other dirty tricks -- are all dangerous and seemingly have no interest in protecting, serving or promoting America. Many are criminals, tax cheats, declared Communists or good old fashion, power-hungry sociopaths. Meanwhile we have a President who spends every waking moment in what psychologists call "Pretend Reality".

It's laughable that years ago people use to scoff at Ronald Regan's run for the Presidency to be one of "just an actor".

In truth, President Barack Obama makes it nearly a daily occurrence to stand in the spot light while he lies his butt off to America. Now that's acting! Thankfully Americans are growing tired of the Obama Soap Opera.

One of the bumper stickers from SatireWorks.com says: "To Obama it's not a job, it's an adventure and we're paying for the ride!" I don't think the man has anything but his own ego to be served each day. If you were upset with recent political cartoons of him portrayed as "The Joker", how are you going to feel when he is accurately portrayed with a tight little black mustache on his upper lip?

Here's your chance to speak out. You can either e-mail us (customer services at satireworks.com) or comment on the blog. How would you defeat a Nancy Pelosi in the 2010 Election?